To start off with here uh today, before we get further into it, i would also like to say for everybody: that's currently watching right now that we are gon na be bringing on tmi the masked investor. Later today, whenever he's free, he's gon na hit me up and we're just gon na be shooting the talking about whatever whatever ever baby. You already know how this goes uh, but i thought nancy pelosi, man, that's something else. I don't know uh.

I i i think if, if anybody had a crystal ball, let me tell you what i've got a magic eight ball, and i asked this: i asked dear magic, hey paul. If there's any wizard on planet earth that can that can make uh make the stock. Do the dirty dancing thing where it uh, where it goes only up and never goes down it. The printer never runs out of ink.

That's the person. What comes after amc bro. We need new content, so i actually took a poll on this and uh before we get further into uh. The stream i'll show you this and i got some uh some feedback and some comments on it and i get where you're coming from right.

I understand people's uh people's feelings towards uh the stock market right now there are those who are simply focused on on amc and that's cool, but i'm going to read this off to you. I took a poll. It ends in about five hours. If you'd like to vote, this is up on my twitter page, but this is uh.

The current results, i'll roll with whatever twitter decides, and i mean that if twitter decided no, i would have not done it. Should i head back ta on mid slash big cat place to the video reservoir, and this is important to note? Is i'm not stepping away from amc content? In fact, i think i'm one of the few who still updates on a regular basis, while also trying to touch on broad market news, because i do think that applies right. I try to focus on whatever i think is important for the current situation, and i said this focus around setups daily flips reviews. I will not do small caps and low flows because pump is not life, and that's that's kind of my my joking way of saying that i uh i'm not gon na i'm not gon na around with these other.

These other penny stocks. These these squeeze plays these low floaters. The stocks that that have crazy one two three day runs and then uh and then they're done, i'm just not gon na mess around with that, because i think it's irresponsible for a guy with 400 000 subscribers ish a little less than that to uh to be Talking about a stock that has a 10 million share float that is inequitably and equivocally uh. I could move that stock and i don't want to do that so it'd be focused around swinging day trading, uh flipping, whatever mid large cap place, that'd, be it so uh.

I will be getting back in other stuff, that's one thousand percent going to happen and i'm excited for it. You know unless in the next five hours this changes, so if you want to take a vote, feel free to do so, but uh amc is not going nowhere. I am i'm sticking this out until uh until zero or until the day comes. That's it uh.

Tmi is in here: let's get this rocking chilling right now. I just watched the uh the interview with um with who was it uh aoc talking about congress, yeah what'd, you think of that walk me through it dude i didn't get the chance to watch it. Yet. I hopped on uh on the live at 1 20 and i was kind of going over some of the nancy pelosi and jim cramer uh jim cramer.

That's everything around very bad person. Nancy pelosi is a horrible person. Okay, i don't write the rules. It's very simple stuff: dude.

The google calls that she had made her look like a freaking crystal ball, she's genius, absolutely genius, uh, just another call just another call uh but yeah with aoc she's. Basically, talking about um trading, individual stocks um, she didn't really get into derivatives. She didn't really get too much detail, but just basically saying that, like you know, she's part of congress they're privy to a lot of uh information that can you know really direct them and how to make money off of you know the future outcomes of their decisions. So they should just be able to.

You know, use blind trust or just invest in an etf and that's about it. You know there was an analogy that that uh that i was told that i find to be very interesting. It's it's like if you were to say a referee, can can bet on a sports game when they control the outcome of the sports game. Yep.

I don't know if i can, how can you argue the fact that politicians can trade individual stocks? I mean there's a coach, i can't remember the coach, maybe you know who this is, but there was a football coach that came out and said uh. You know i can't i can't bet on sports games because i'm a coach, you know i, i kind of control the outcome and he didn't even really control the outcome as much uh. He just coaches. You know he says i can't bid on the games and i'm cool with that.

So why can politicians inside or trade? Why can't they? Why can't they trade individual stocks? You know it just seems like one of those things where the gas lighting and the the mentality has been like something overlooked for so long that people just like let it go for all these years and now they're just like trying to argue the fact that it Doesn't exist, it shouldn't shouldn't matter. This problem isn't there when, when it's finally being addressed, i don't know. I just don't understand how you can make this argument beautiful here we go. This is the goods.

It's not really a mystery to me. Why it's difficult to pass an enormous amount? I wouldn't be surprised if there was a majority of members of congress, uh hold and trade individual stock. I don't know the actual numbers, but it was a very large degree, and you know the key here is that it's not to say that you can't have a retirement fund or a college savings account or blind trust, a blind trust, a mutual fund, an index fund. These are vehicles of investments that are broad that individual members of congress don't have direct control over, but even last year there was at least 75 members of congress that held individual stock in johnson, johnson, vader and pfizer, and we're talking about in the last one to Two years, and so that is where we should be drawing the line - i am a member of congress.

Members of congress have access to very sensitive security clearances. We have access to very detailed tailored rates. We our job, is to try to anticipate and legislate for what we see is coming and we should not have the ability to both have access to that information and be able to hold and trade individual stock, and that's really what this is about. It's about our ability to direct and hold trades in individual stock, with access to the sense of information that the public has given us.

That's a pretty uh, it's a pretty decent. Take i mean like so this is the kind of stuff where we're starting to get more attention right now. This is flying around twitter. Right now has a hundred thousand views on twitter, so i can only imagine what this is gon na do on several different social platforms, and it's just the conversation is happening.

It's slowly starting to get there right. You know what the catalyst was. You know what it was. I know you know what it was yep.

It was unusual, wales, tweet that went viral when a joe rogan. I have the photo right here of every single member of congress that beat this fine 2021 starting off with austin scott brian mass french hill, john curtis dan crenshaw. All the names are here: it's nice, every single one, it's nuts! The funny thing is this right. I think i spoke to you about this before.

If you have members of congress that are making this kind of money, why are they working? Why are they working these jobs? You can do what you're doing from a sandy beach anywhere you want in the world. Why are you still because you need the job to make this kind of money and that itself is wrong? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah 100, so i think uh we talked about this once offline, but it's like why? Wouldn't nancy pelosi go start a hedge fund. You know she's she's, a great trader right she's. She makes 200 000 a year and she's worth nine figures.

Congratulations! Uh! You know! A successful trader should be able to do that on their own without inside information shouldn't they wouldn't you think, wouldn't you want to go, manage somebody else's money and make some more money on top of you making a bunch of money, i don't know - maybe maybe maybe They need the job they have to give to their husband to give to their cousin to give to their brother to give to their stepmom to give to their stepmom's son so that they can make some good money. I don't know, maybe the stepmom stuck in the dryer still goes to the sun, or maybe goes to that. Who knows you know, but at the end of the day, uh it's pretty obvious man, it's just a conflict of interest. That seems like the whole story of the stock market.

Man whole stock market's a conflict of interest. I mean to be honest, even like uh us talking about an individual stock if we come at it with even a slight fraction of uh bias is a conflict of interest. You know it's it's, it's the it's a system, man, it's a whole system. It's tough to stuff to wrap your head around, but we are making progress that that uh that that freaking aoc is nasty.

That's a good thing to see! Truly! Is what do you? What do you make of uh, the the refinancing of uh, of of the liens um? I mean i feel like it's. It's uh, i wan na say nothing, nothing deal, but it's a step forward in the right direction. In my opinion, like it's it's you know from a business perspective, you're trying to make the right moves and you don't want anything to hinder you right now, which i like. What are your thoughts? I think it's uh it's similar to if you're saving a percent or two on uh refinance on a car or a mortgage right, you're, ultimately just trying to keep a couple extra nickels in your bank, so you can uh, you can be cash heavy, which is, i Think what amc's priority is, i think, they've shown that's their biggest priority over the last year.

They take a lot of a lot of pride in sitting on 1.8 billion dollars of cash right now, and i think they want to keep it that way with the war chest that uh aaa likes to bring up every once in a while yeah every other day. Yeah yeah, we got we, we were armed with the war chest. Oh man, all right. So what do you think? What do you think about this market right now? I know i know we're kind of just like spitballing a little bit but uh.

You know i feel like today was kind of like a rug pull waiting to happen. We saw a nice rise. Yesterday, google came with information that kind of had nancy pelosi's bank account just fat as all hell uh. I think earnings are really propping this up right.

Now you had great earnings, especially from amd amd, had a a great call uh, but i think it's gon na fade. I mean you, look at google. You look at amd all these different names that had great after hours, pops uh their fades into the open. You know uh, i'm i'm watching that divergence if you look at it from uh like an economic standpoint, i think that ukraine is something that i would watch closely.

I think it's it's more of a a front than it is a call to arms. You know somebody earlier called it posturing, so it's it's just basically being like look they'll mess with uh ukraine. We've got people here. It's not a good idea, whatever uh inflation and jobs are probably the two biggest things right now, so inflation has really changed.

The rate hikes are still going to happen. There's still, the uncertainty of is the first one going to be in march, which is what people are anticipating and then uh jobs. So companies unexpectedly cut 301 000 jobs in january as omicron slams, labor market adp says, and 300 1 000 jobs doesn't sound like a ton, maybe like it's. What is it a percent one percent of the total uh total population of the united states, but how much of a percent of that is of the of the total labor force? You know exactly: that's that has a trickle effect.

I think uh people aren't really reacting to that news, which you know it's. It's not game, breaking news, but it is still the economy which reflects uh. The stock market reflects the economy, so i don't know. I think that i think, there's still probably a little more downside, but for now the stock market's green, i'm just watching that divergence and if you see it pop in volume, maybe it's a true uh, true bottom.

I guess i just don't know yet like it looks like it, i don't know we could retrace very quickly. I'm not convinced either man we're at four f yeah. 4 57. It did.

It looks good, but i can see it's come back down to 450. Honestly, in a day's notice, like just my bags, are packed whenever spy's ready to go yeah the spy is uh, it's just been slow chopping. It's been slowly. Uh chopping, wood, just grinding grinding its way up, wedged out earlier in the day popped up off that wedge.

Breakout had a false break down underneath that wedge. Actually, but i don't know this the market's just nuts right now. Basically, since that bed talk the since that bed talking had one other major sell-off and everything since then has just been a juke. It really has like i'm looking at this like this, could be the nastiest bear flake of the spy right now yeah like i'm just like this would hurt like hurt a lot.

You had this sort of flag pattern, which is clean. I mean that's a clean. Looking. Looking bear flag, that's about as even even steven as it gets, lower highs, lower highs, lower highs and it broke it.

I guess we're just in a market now, where you break, bear flags uh up and you break both legs down. I don't know it doesn't really make sense to me, because you know you're a little bit more um experienced in the market. You can, you know, know your limits play within it. A lot of people are are used to holding on to a position.

For you know an x amount of time like last year, and it just ultimately goes up, no matter what happens, they go down for a few days. They'll come back up a few days later, this market isn't that anymore. So a lot of people are getting burned. Holding on to position from way too much way too much time and uh, i feel, like you know the first few weeks here, people learned a lot of lessons the hard way, but hopefully it makes things easier in the future.

Nobody likes a bear market right. If you uh, if you talk about a bear market, i'm not a fear-mongering guy right. I just like talking about the facts. I think there's a lot of youtubers out there that use the the death thumbnails.

You know the market crash, the the fire uh the the market to zero, whatever that's uh drastic over exaggeration, but in the short term, if you make the wrong decision, it can really hurt you. You know, and i think it is important to be able to discuss that because, ultimately, it's real money, you know uh, i don't know you just have to look at it objectively. You have to realize that the market continuously goes up and amc being a part of the market, especially iwm. If you were to look at iwm right now, let's pull this up for you.

You look at monthly candles. This thing, trends upwards, you know same as amc - will trend upwards in uh. The long term, if you are holding stock uh share count, share count, something that's being discussed right now. Uh in terms of the current situation with amc, people want to see a share count from adam aaron, and this is actually a situation where i i don't see why they couldn't do that.

Every quarter, but uh shoot us. Your opinion man. Let's, let's talk about it, so i i i think, there's uh, i think, there's a few different opinions on what we will actually find from doing a share count and what what what the upsides actually look like and i'm not opposed to it. I'm with it.

I mean counting the shares if we are the shareholders we hold the vast majority of shares. I shouldn't say the vast, as retail, for the majority shareholder in amc right, because the vast is just a undefined um amount, but if we want the shares to be counted, that's fine. What are the results we'd be able to find? We probably would be able to find uh legal shares in market. We probably would be able to find a updated number on the amount of shares that's actually held by retail, all positive information.

In my opinion, i would just not be looking forward to a home run short squeeze immediately after a share kind of play right. What's your opinion on that, i think that a share count is important not only in terms of being able to identify synthetic shares, but also to have a pulse on the core of your your investors right the last time that we were able to know the percentage Of retail investors that are in amc - and i find that to be fascinating because that drastically changes the thesis behind what apes talk about right, uh, it's important to know who your clientele is, who holds your stock. So, for example, right. We knew back in march that uh amc was owned by about 80 retail investors right it was.

It was a very, very large number and we haven't really got an update on that. Since i mean there's been like inklings rumors, i've heard, like uh ted talks about about it, but i haven't seen numbers or data which i'd i'd like to see, because that can change sort of the picture in terms of how other people uh analyze the current stock. Now, obviously, it'd be sick to be able to to crack down on naked shorts, which i know is doable right. I i, i don't think enough.

People talk about this. I don't think enough. People talk about this ater ceo right. I've brought this up probably five or six times, and it doesn't stick, but i think people really need to think about this.

Hard ater publicly came out and said our stock was naked short sold to the multitude of nearly half of our overall float, meaning that 150 of the stock was floating around and you know where that came from. I could guarantee where it came from. You probably already know this derivatives call options: gamma, squeezing there's market makers that that wrote up a bunch of freaking contracts, a stock market up to 50 dollars. And then what do you do? You got? You got to create shares that don't exist, and this goes on with with market makers and there's institutions a little more difficult with institutions right, it's very difficult to just write up a naked short and throw it into the market.

It's really market makers that this stuff up, but that 1 million percent happened right. So when you look back at the data for amc, for example, you look at the ftds for the year. Well, i've seen articles stating that amc's ftds are up what nineteen hundred percent so far this year. Well, what are ftds well in ftd if failure to deliver is a share.

That's not delivered uh! That basically shows that there could be synthetic shares that were floating in the market, at least in that moment in time. Why would you not want to look into that? You know and i'll be honest with you. I have always been and i still do - support adam aaron like i've been a stan. I've been an adam stan, but this is definitely something i think people should talk about.

That's all i'll say funny no go ahead. I think it's funny. You don't have to say you're being honest with me. I know you say that sometimes but like i feel like you usually are.

When you say i'm being honest with you, then i wonder the times that you don't say, i'm being honest with you. Are you being honest, i'm lying to you straight up straight up, lie to you uh, but no, no you're! Right! I think a few things one is the ceo of atr. I did send him a dm, so if he has him catching this clip, i sent him a dm saying. I would love to speak to you.

I would love to interview. Let's get this stuff done, it's as a conversation that i think whether or not action is actually being taken place from amc and their upper management, i'm not going to say simply just adam aaron, the ceo, who probably has the the strongest um hold, or at least The most influence of the company that might not be an individual decision he can make. But that being said, you know the ceo of the company. I would love to have a conversation with him.

I would love anybody in the community to talk to him just because that information, i think, would be eye opening for a lot of people one. The second thing is look at a t e r stock. After that information came out, look at the result. So my thing is like: did it get worse after he said that it seems that way, man, it really does and uh? Is there a possibility that the same thing could happen with amc? It's possible yeah.

You know - and i want that's why i want to have a conversation because people's we we we're reaching for a lot. We want the results, but i think we have to think things all the way through saying: okay, cool, let's not reach for something and get bit now. You know i mean let's figure out what we're reaching for all the way through and then figure out. If it's, what we really want right - and i think, is what we want - i just want to double check.

I want to make sure so i thought about that. Let's talk about this really quick. What what do you think the difference is between ater aider and amc? Why do you think aider when that news came out, didn't have any sort of backing? I think the actual tweet had maybe 500 retweet or 500 likes a thousand likes thinking any traction? Why do you think? That is why? What do you think the difference would be between amc or gamestop and aider that community one million percent? If the ceo of amc came out or the ceo of gamestop publicly came out and said, we have solidified proof that our stocks have been manipulated. They've been targeted, they've been naked short sold even by a share.

You know, what's gon na happen, it'll be everywhere: mainstream media, it's gon na, be all over youtube. You're gon na get millions and millions tens of millions hundreds of millions of views, because the thing that people have been talking about for literally a year would be solidified. It would be true, it wouldn't be a a a freaking dead mouse under a rug right. It's not something you're just going to cover up.

I think the reason. The only reason that ada wasn't talked about more is because people have blinders on right, they're focused on what they want to focus on right now, which is amc and gamestop, and that's that you know it's just that's just the way that it was there are those Who recognize it and that sort of thing, but the truth of the matter is people's attention are here? So if people's attention are here and we got a share over the count and that came out, i think it's nine day difference. I really do. I think that would be the the the game ender now.

This is all really contingent, obviously on on adam aaron or ryan cohen, being able to come out and prove that it does exist. But there is proof that you can do it and there is and that's why i want to have the interview, because i want the proof to be out there. I want the i want to walk the process. When did you realize that you had to get this done? I can even ask the questions and he can even answer in a tweet if he wants to when what puts you to the position, what put you in a position where you said you had to get this done, i'm guessing it's because you already knew it right.

How did you find out? Who did you hire? How did you look into it? How long was that process? What were the steps that that person or that agency or that entity took to actually isolate where the wrongdoing was, and then, if you could bring it to mark in a different way? How would you do it now right? These are the questions that i don't think we necessarily need to be asking, i think amc and their upper management need to be looking for audit like off the rip. The reason why we're in this play in the first place is because we already knew there was wrongdoing, so this was a year ago. So the fact that we're trying to figure out and be the investigators now you know it's not it's not great, but yeah. Let's get to work, i think it's important man, i think any data is powerful.

You know data and and history teach you a lot so, for example, like a lot of uh a lot of what is happening right now in the current economy. I think, is predictable. It was predictable because of what happened 100 years ago. That's just an example.

History can teach you things. So if there's historical evidence of a ceo publicly coming out and stating that his company was making sure it's old and he proved it and he found a way to prove it and even to the multitude of exact number of shares, it's doable, it can be done And i i suppose the question then is what would it take to uh for adam aaron or orion cohen, to want to dive into that? What evidence would they need to see to be able to to take that on now? I think they're they're much different companies right. You can't compare apples to oranges. Aider doesn't even remotely do anything close to what amc does amc doesn't do anything remotely close to what gamestop does they're all different companies.

So the ceos have different mindsets. They've got different agendas whatever, but at the end of the day you know i i do think it's worth looking into. I don't know i i feel like it's it's something that is worth considering and i was on the uh, the other side of the coin. For a long time of like just let the man work, you know we don't need, and this isn't me like stating we need immediate results, we need it now.

We need the squeeze now. It's not even about that. It's about up these these that that illegally take your money. That's it! Okay, all right, no be serious! Bro! That's what it is! These people steal from you, they steal from you.

They steal from you, they steal from me. They steal from everybody watching the stream who buys small, mid cap stocks every small, mid cap stock. If you were to ask me right now, or the last 12 months, what's been happening with these stocks, i tell you: they've been slapped, they've been getting crapped on by institutions and market makers who rake the system. I mean it's just there and it's not just not just the last 12 months.

I honestly believe it, and you know we already know this. It's been years. The only reason why we're here and there's a difference being made is because they took too much money at the same, damn time to a point where we could not ignore it right think about this way: they've been pilfering, pilfering, meaning you you steal such a small, Not for you trade, but general public, you steal such a small amount. You barely even recognize it just pilfering, just a little bit bits and pieces.

You do that. For years you amount a freaking kingdom of money of wealth from retail investors. Now you took so much that people could not deny it, because this was a plate where retail was right. Undeniably, retail was right and it was stolen at this point in time enough people realized, we just lost a whole bunch of money.

Now, let's figure out what happened there, if they just took a little bit of time, nobody would even care. But then, when i saw atr ceo come out with this information and then the company continued to get slapped. What looked like, even worse than the get-go it looked like, they were trying to send a message. It looked like they tried to tell that guy shut the up and get back to doing your job and let it short your company, that's that's what the chart looks like if you look at when that message came out and the actual chart - and this is why I want to get this guy to have a conversation get the word out, because we can't have people that come out with the truth, get slapped like that.

That's not how this works. That's not how it should work right. Like you know, we should have people that come out and do the right thing for their company, for their investors, put on a pedestal and spread that message. I want to hear it.

I want to see the date that he tweeted this out, so that can show what this uh, what this really looked like, because you're spot on the money with this aider ceo tweets about naked shorts. This was four months ago. The date was october 14th uh, the ceo's name is yaniv sadiq. He tweets out this uh a tyrion takes his fiduciary role seriously.

We hired a third party firm to investigate a legal naked short selling on our stock. This process takes time. Please stay tuned uh, so that was on october 14th that he tweeted out that he was going to do it uh. Let's just check this next preliminary data on illegal naked short selling is in seven million shares as of october 15th.

So if you were to check out the data from october 15th, we'll pull this up here, really quick october 15th, the stock was trading at uh. What appears to be eight dollars and 73 cents had a couple day push most likely from retail. Getting excited about the fact that uh all the naked shorts were exposed and then it just continued the dump. It was the same story all over again.

It went all the way down to 245. It went down an additional 75 percent from that 8.70. 65. It's very obvious man.

I mean you're spot on the money with that you're spot on the money when you say that these guys were like shut up. You can't say this: you can't do this, but i'll tell you what like we talked about. The difference is community people, voices noise that would not go. It would not get swept under the rug with these stocks there's no way.

I don't believe that for a second, i i think this is uh. This is worth talking about because it's an undeniable truth right. The majority of people that are in the community right now are here to do one thing and that's to make money right. That's important! It's it's! That's! The point of the stock market is to make money we're all here for a squeeze right.

We all want to see amc do something just nasty uh, and because of that, when price is down, it plays a psychological effect on the community. The people within the community and things start to shake. They start to get a little weaker at times, uh. The core is still there: the core of the community's still there but uh unequivocally right, there's no doubt about it.

Stock price affects sentiment, so how? How is it? What what in your mind, is the key to affecting the change that you want to see while we're in the situation that we're in because it's it's kind of an oxymoron right, you think about it like this. There are uncontrollable factors with market makers, institutions, mainstream media that affects stock price across all small mid cap companies. Amc is, is the one that i talk about. You talk about both amc and gamestop, but these are two names out of what i think are dozens and dozens and dozens of small and mid-cap companies that get absolutely butt.

So how how do we? How do we get those names to be pushed in a way that affects the change that allows them to run, because, if i think about it personally, it's like okay, if we, if we, if we get one stock to squeeze well, that doesn't necessarily guarantee you that The the entire system will be better right. It doesn't guarantee that the the villains, the the corrupt, will get put behind bars or a jail or get slapped with a one percent of their their earnings. Fine, who knows how do you, but on the other hand, though right, if you can effect change you get these guys to get out of positions, or perhaps one ceo of a company gets the ball rolling and it pushes this sort of like. Ah, we got ta get things going like the sec and finn run uh governing bodies ftcc all these different, all these different bodies.

How do you get them interested in what we're talking about and i think that derives from the community. I've done rambling, you you're saying. I think i think that the not the issue but the the the war that we're facing right now internally in our community is market transparency and and and a a fair and honest market and a short squeeze are two different fights. They can be synonymous but they're.

Two different fights, and not everybody - that's here for a short squeeze - is down to get the market, transparency and and fairness in the market, and that is a that is the honest truth from what i'm seeing in our community and which is fine right, because people didn't Come here for a fair market, they came here because mark was already up. They want to make some money off of it, because the mark's been making money off of them in the first place. So i'm witnessing a lot of people that are saying. Listen i'm down for all this.

You know for the market, but give my money first, and i think that totally it's real money. What i would say is this: if you had the community choose - and i would never ask me to choose this publicly, if you had the community, choose nine out of ten people would say, give me my money. Let them do whatever the hell they wants to market, and that is honestly what i feel people feel in their soul. Give me my money, you know what i mean like give me what i deserve as a freaking citizen of whatever country you guys are coming from, but just give me my money and we'll talk about everything else afterwards.

Now the the confusing thing is this: in order to get that money, i think we're going to have to work on market transparency, because it's not just going to be now. It's going to be an issue later, an issue later an issue later people might sell their share. Who knows what the number is? It might not get cash for a long period of time because of market transparency. There could be several different implications that are so.

I think you know, as time has gone on the direction of where our community is going, has kind of become blurred. We don't really know exactly what the next step is. Are we going too far to the left? Are we going to the right we're kind of doing different dancing to different music, we're all dancing, but we're just dancing to slightly different music? Some people merengue some people are salsa. We don't know what the hell exactly is going on.

Yeah right some people just don't know how to dance like myself, exactly we're working on that we're working on some day. So i think i think the thing is this right. I think if people get down with the whole all right, you know what that let's get back to it, let's get by and hold. Let's get you know: rockford stock, let's get the energy back cool and then we're gon na have to knowingly so put transparency on the background, if that's the case, then we're really taking a step back for future generations for we're really being selfish and admittedly so.

You know we're saying the rest of retail investors right now. We just want ours and that's a difficult thing to swallow for a lot of people, but it's the choice that we have to kind of. You know, look at you know. This is actually a good question that i think we can run.

I i've got a poll running right now, chad, if you want to, if you want to add to this, it's uh. The question is: will you be staying in the market after amc, yes and knowing answers? Obviously, but i think that's ultimately what it is right. You don't really give a what's going on with the market if you're not a part of it. If you don't have some sort of attachment to it, so i think the ultimate question is, or do you have interest in creating a market after this saga has ended? That is, is better built for people to learn and to make money in a fair, a fair way in a transparent way.

Speaking of transparency, by the way we're over 2 500 likes, which means that you got to give us uh a mask, reveal some point. In q1 huh, so the deal was in the first 15 minutes uh. I don't know if i heard that i don't know if i heard that i think you're adding it's online, it's online, it's online, but you know what uh but we'll figure that out. That's not problem, we'll figure that out we'll uh, we'll uh we'll have the date back here.

Uh sooner than later. Maybe we'll talk about next week. All right man sounds good, we'll revisit that, we'll revisit that. That sounds fun done and done, but you know, i think, that's a great question to ask.

I'm really curious to see how the poll is is going to react um, because yeah, a lot of people are very pissed right, they're, it's it's weird, because you're pissed, because the market's not transparent, not not transparent, but you're, not really looking to fix it. You just want to get your money and that's fine and that's why we're here in the first place right, but it's it's just a very interesting thing to witness. You know i lost what i was to say. I don't know what i was about to say.

That happens sometimes bro. I don't know what to tell you about that. My uh, my brain's always running a million miles an hour. Let me think, let me think it'll come back.

It'll come back, we'll come back yeah. You know what so i'll ask you. This question. Um for for a transparent market right, how long do you think the fight will actually be before we start seeing we're already starting to see like change happen at a faster pace than we've ever seen before? In my honest opinion, already right, but how long until you think we have, you know t plus zero settlement like how long do you actually start seeing some of these things that we've been talking about for a long period of time? If you want my honest answer, i think it's written all over history books.

If you look at any major existential crisis, that's threatened humanity or or a a category of humanity. People are reactionary, they're, not proactive, and i'm not talking retail. I'm talking to people that govern the way that humans live life, so the top one percenters, the federal reserve, politicians uh, if there's some sort of secret circle, jerk that i don't know about - probably those guys too right. These guys are existentialists.

They the secret circle. Jerk. You know if there's, if there's some secret secret circle, jerk of people that that that manage the way of life that we live them too right all right. But let me let me go on with my point.

I think what it really comes down to is people uh at the top will not affect change unless it threatens their way of life permanently uh. So what i think is the stock market. If you really want to see all of the change that we've won like immediately done just like that, it would happen in the exact same way as perhaps uh global warming. Let's just say, let's just use that as an example right from just a completely scientific standpoint.

Uh, if global warming was to the point where yeah we can see data here, that proves that within 50 years, humanity will will be wiped out right. We're you're gon na you're gon na absolutely melt. All the ice across the world, oceans will flood all of the land and we'll all drown the death right just an example, just some random stuff. If that came out that data came out, and everyone could just say yup 50 years from now we're going to die.

They're going to start making change to try and avoid that it's existentialism. It's the same way that the stock market, i think, will work so what it'll come down to is. We can see there's going to be a financial catastrophe that could threaten not only our way of life, but the entire economy's way of life, which would ruin our way of life, because that's ultimately what they care about, not us, it's them, it's them. What threatens our way of life uh, i think that's what it would take.

It would take their way of life being threatened to truly amass the change uh across the entire stock market that we want to see - maybe that's a pessimistic view, but i think you can just look back on a lot of different scenarios, a little bit existentialism uh. Being displayed in a lot of different ways: uh through through time, you know, maybe i'm wrong. Who knows? No, i think i think you're hitting it head-on right and it's it's um. I think that's a a bit of a deeper conversation like you know, that's that's! The real like hard-hitting, the market, will never be the same kind of questions.

You asked for your kids there's just no going back um, but i think you're right. I think i don't think we are going to see what we want to see in the short term, but i think the change i think what we're going to do is is uh is, is affect the change that will result in this market forever being different. I don't know when it's going to happen, but uh. You know the wheels already been set in motion.

The ball has already been rolling now and i think that you know people that are coming into the market. Knowing what we know now is gon na be different and i'm actually looking to see if not to get into crypto but to see if you know we start seeing the same things happen in that market as well, where we're gon na start seeing some tomfoolery. If you will in the crypto market, you think that the stock market is bad, that it's a wild wild west over there. I think we're gon na start, seeing retail looking for change and transparency over there as well, like it's gon na start coming across the board, and then it's gon na leave finances to start going to government like it's gon na start happening everywhere.

People are just gon na start, we're in the you know we're in the the age of of intelligence. We're we're we're much smarter than retail was 10 15 years ago in comparison right. So we have all the tools at our fingertips. We just have to freaking.

Do it, what do you think retail is lacking as a tool to be able to compete with uh institutions in wall street right now, um team team team team team team? I think i think wall street has well she's back, no matter what i don't have to like you. I don't care what race you are. I don't have to like your religion. I could be racist, you could be sexist.

I don't care you from wall street. I got your back because money comes first, i want to protect my money. You protect my money, we're on the same squad. We compete, but don't get twisted.

Is us first them on wall street right? They know we keep our money over here. We keep our issues in here. It's like a code of silence over there and it's it's it's up, but it's you kind of respect. It you're, like okay cool, but with us when times get rough with us.

People start talking to the crazy, as i'm like one more second, we're still in the same squad, though right yeah he's like i could, i could say, cool calm collected as much as i possibly want. I don't have to like anybody, but are you buying and holding have you been taking a l with me? Have you been you know in and out of the trenches, okay cool, we're on the same team? People don't get that sometimes it's like no well! You bought this point time i bought in this, but i don't care we both got like that's it. Who cares? Let's get like, let's shut the up the arm and arm, let's get freaking loud, stop tweeting, simply using the same hashtag, amc and gme start tweeting about amazing gm put tesla in there start tweeting about amc and jimmy and put whatever the trending topic is of the Day, you know what i mean like we need to to mobilize not as a collusion buying a certain time and date, just simply speaking about what's going on with the wrong doing that's going on in the market, that's affecting our money, guys if you haven't uh, if You're not sub to tmi, i'm gon na link his twitter, i'm gon na pin it in uh the comment, so you can check that out here. Really quick, but uh he's a good friend of mine.

I i've i've talked with tmi. I've met him in person. A couple times he is a real person. No, he is not keenan grace.

I see that people think he's keenan gracie is not keenan grace, but uh the day that he unmasks well will eventually come and i'm not going to spoil that moment for him. So it'll come i'll come sooner than later. I promise you guys when the time comes, we'll have some fun. I promise you guys, i don't like venom all right, yeah naked shorts, everyone's saying, yeah, baby all day baby all day, all right, trey, listen, i'm gon na jump! All right! You have yourself a good one, enjoy enjoy the rest of the stream and uh.

We'll. Definitely talking a bit all right brother thanks for chatting. I appreciate you, man, no problem. All right guys take care uses.

Take it easy that was some good stuff. Let's look at the spy right now. What is this knife yuck? That is a hell of a knife in the after hours. We're watching happen right now, uh, let's look across the board.

What earnings do we have uh this after hours market right now, that's affecting the spy? In that way, spy was down in the first couple. Minutes of after hours point four four percent: that was a nasty knife, candle, uh earnings this week, wells fargo city group, blackrock, jpm, uh. No, that's not right! Earnings calendar! That's, probably a little better. All right! I've got the earnings calendar up.

This is from nasdaq uh fiscal quarter. Ending. You can see a whole bunch of different dates here, so it looks like the second and the third last year's report date. Last year's eps is this updated february 2nd.

Oh yeah check this out all right. What names we got abbv facebook? How did facebook perform? I'm actually interested in this? Those are some dope tubes, doom doom candles baby. Oh my god, yikes whoa where'd. They go wrong.

Oh no! Oh! Oh! That's! So gross! Oh, my god! Sorry sorry! That was. I was not expecting that we are just in the season of craziness: oh yikes, spot spotify. Oh everything, everything's just getting slapped, oh god, oh man, doom dooms. Now i got to see what jim cramer was pumping that was so gross dude on facebook.

Maybe they shouldn't have changed the name to meta, maybe maybe maybe they should stop mining data. Maybe they should just not sick. Maybe they - maybe maybe maybe you flip the chat absent in and it's not it's not red. It's green and it's good, that's so gross! Oh god, dude dude, this is so nasty.

It's up, dr dove is in the house. Oh man, do you have any words on facebook? Let's check this out. Let's check this out fb uh facebook earnings three months ago, three months ago october, 4th blowback against facebook is real and different. This time you might have actually been right about that.

You might have actually been right. Yeesh, that's some gnarly stuff spy is almost down point. Seven percent: in the after hours, that's a nasty little knife uh. We will be back likely tomorrow for either a live stream and if it's not a live stream, you know all the typical videos come out and we'll talk about whatever's, hot, so uh as always gorilla gang.

It's been a long time. I've missed this. This is good. I love hanging out with you boys and girls.

I love uh being a live stream and i hope that you all are uh are all chilling. That's it at the end of the day, all right gang.